The No. 1 source of benefits reimbursement fraud
September 5, 2008 by Bill MeltzerPosted in: Compensation, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Paid time off
Every company with paid time off, flexible spending accounts, health reimbursement accounts and similar benefits is at risk of improper reimbursements. In extreme cases, there can be outright fraud.
In most cases, the mistakes are honest, but costly. An HRA administrator may reimburse an ineligible medical expense (e.g., an excluded service for a pre-existing condition) or an employee may not have met his or her share of a deductible but been paid anyway. Periodic audits are a must.
An even bigger concern: reimbursement fraud. One rather alarming report claims that companies’ payroll departments are organizations’ biggest source of potential benefits fraud. I do not agree with the study author’s conclusion, but it’s still a must-read for the way the study shows just how easily fraud can occur.
How it happens: The company cuts a check for a legit benefits claim. The check gets cashed – but not by the employee entitled to the money. Instead, it’s channeled to the payroll employee administering the reimbursement plan. The most vulnerable victims are employees who either don’t know they’re entitled to certain benefits, or are unaware of how much they’re owed. Recently terminated employees are another prime victim.
While the vast majority of Payroll employees are honest, it pays to have procedures in place to:
- keep employees’ and managers’ signatures on file in case the handwriting needs to be audited against reimbursement checks
- run reports of recently terminated employees, and audit canceled benefits reimbursement checks cut in their names
- consider the use of direct deposit for these benefits, and
- establish an anonymous reporting system if an employee suspects fraud.

May 22nd, 2008 at 2:28 pm
I suppose fraud is a fact of life, but as a payroll administrator I take umbrage at your implication that the payroll department is one of the biggest the sources. I read the report you cited and read that the payroll department was not the problem, but the local account manager who was responsible for disbursing paychecks and notifying of terminated employees. It was the Payroll department rather, that identified the fraud not committed it!
November 10th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
This article leaves a very distorted view of the report that it refers to. The report does not in any way indicate fraud on the part of anyone in the Payroll / HR department. The fraud was perpetrated by a supervisor at an operating level. This type of fraud is very difficult to stop; no matter how good your HR department is, if your employees are not diligent in checking their pay stubs and W-2s to see that they tie to their actual receipts. In this case, the employee was somewhat to blame for not paying attention to their records and noticing the discrepancies. You should probably read more than the first line of a report before using it in an attack on HR personnel. In the report you cite, it is nearly impossible to assess blame to anyone in the HR department for this fraud.