Benefits & Compensation News

Obamacare springs new, expensive contractor misclassification penalty

If you’re growing tired of the huge compliance responsibilities Obamacare’s created, you won’t like this: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will now require employers to put even more effort into making sure workers are classified correctly.

Prior to the passage of Obamacare, difficult economic conditions and tighter budgets sparked many employers to start using more independent contractors. After all, they don’t require the same costly benefits and tax obligations regular, full-time employees would.

Unfortunately, some of those employers overstepped their bounds and misclassified individuals who should’ve been employees as independent contractors.

As a result, the IRS and DOL have started an all-out war to hunt down employers who misclassify workers and slap them with large fines, and back pay and tax penalties.

The wave of recent misclassification has also heightened the feds’ senses as to where classification errors are lurking.

Reform makes ICs more appealing, but …

Then, along came Obamacare and its “shared responsibility” requirement that large employers provide employees with a minimum level of affordable health insurance coverage or pay a steep penalty. That made it even more enticing to classify workers as independent contractors.

After all, doing so would help businesses avoid both the cost of healthcare coverage and the penalty that would apply for failing to offer coverage.

The added incentive to classify workers as independent contractors combined with increased enforcement by the IRS and DOL is a dangerous cocktail for employers.

The inherent danger in misclassifying employees as independent contractors grows exponentially when the clock strikes midnight on Jan. 1, 2014 — that’s when the shared responsibility requirement will kick in.

At that point, the penalty for misclassification could go far beyond paying the now standard-fare IRS and DOL fines and enter the waters of uber-expensive Obamacare fines.

When Obamacare fines are triggered

The ACA’s shared responsibility requirement states that large employers (those with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees) must offer its employees “minimum essential coverage.”

If a large employer fails to offer minimum essential coverage to at least one full-time employee — and that employee receives a federal premium tax credit or cost-sharing reduction to purchase health insurance on an exchange — then the employer must pay a $2,000 per-employee penalty for every full-time equivalent employee on staff (minus the first 30 employees).

So how would this impact an employer guilty of misclassification?

Say your company employs 45 full-time employees. It considers itself a small employer under Obamacare and therefore isn’t subject to its shared responsibility requirement. Therefore, it doesn’t offer health coverage to its workforce.

But your company also uses 35 independent contractors. If an audit reveals those contractors are actually full-time employees, your company will become a large employer subject to Obamacare’s shared responsibility penalty — which will be quite expensive.

The feds will say you have 80 full-time employees who aren’t being offered health insurance. It’ll then subtract the first 30 employees from the number, giving you a total of 50 — for each of whom you’ll have to pay the $2,000 penalty.

That’s $100,000 per year.

That penalty, however, can be broken up into one-month increments until your company comes into compliance with the ACA. So the penalty is actually $8,333 per month — in addition to the other fines, back pay and tax penalties the IRS and DOL will slap you with.

So misclassification clearly becomes more costly under Obamacare.

Danger signs

So how can companies protect themselves from classification audits and/or claims of employee misclassification?

First and foremost, when classifying workers, follow the IRS’ three-point checklist for determining a worker’s classification:

  1. Behavioral control. The IRS says if your company has the right to control or direct not just what work needs to be completed, but how it gets completed, the worker is most likely an employee.
  2. Financial control. There are two financial signs that can indicate whether a worker is an independent contractor: The person is most likely an independent contractor if he or she A) has a significant personal investment in the work, or B) can incur a profit or a loss.
  3. Type of relationship. The IRS also looks at how the worker and company perceive the relationship. For example, if the person receives benefits — like insurance, a pension or paid leave — that’s a giveaway the person’s an employee.

There are also several telltale signs independent contractors should actually be employees:

  • They don’t have a business license
  • They don’t have their own place of business
  • They lack their own equipment
  • They are solely dependent on your business, or
  • They perform the same work as those classified as employees.

If any of these conditions apply to independent contractors working for you, it’s time to revisit their classification.

In addition, for the feds to consider someone a bona fide independent contractor, the workers must be in business for themselves, have the power to use their own employees or subcontractors and they should NOT be working full-time for your company.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest benefits and HR news and insights delivered to your inbox.
  • Smehaffey

    Actually, the larger penalty for misclassification was overlooked. That is, the $100/day penalty for the failure to offer insurance within 90 days for any new hire expected to work 30 hours or more per week, or for a variable hour employee compliance with the 13 month rule. Either way, misclassifying these individuals and not offering them health insurance for half of the yearis going to cost the employer over $18,000 for just one person.